Oily Stuff

                        Oily News, Analysis & Opinions

           Oily Photographs, History, Videos & Cartoons

Oily Humor & Short  Stories  About a Very Long, Oily Life

.

  • Home

  • Photograph Stuff

  • News Stuff

  • Chart Stuff

  • Forum Stuff

  • Old Post Stuff

  • Who Writes This Stuff

  • Video Stuff

    To see this working, head to your live site.
    1. Forum Stuff
    2. Lipstick On a Pig
    Search
    Mike Shellman
    Feb 9
      ·  Edited: Feb 9

    Lipstick On a Pig


    Best not buy into the current round of putting lipstick on a pig by the main stream media, shale oil pundits, cheerleaders and shale oil companies themselves; at $53 WTI nobody makes ENOUGH money to keep drilling wells to maintain a RRR of 100% and pay down debt at the same time. Its not possible. Shale oil basins are still getting gassy and well productivity has plateaued or going down. Sweet spots are drilled up and now its on to the secondary stuff. Think Halliburton and H&P will want to keep losing money servicing the US shale oil sector? Nah. This current administration will cause regulatory compliance costs to go up and demand for oil to go down, down more than the COVID crisis has already caused. The rest of the world can bring on 8MM BOPD of additional crude oil production at the drop of a hat if and when it needs to. Oil prices will correct, down, just as fast as they went up.


    If you get a case of the Seeking Alphees and think you may actually want to jump in and buy some shale oil stock, stop what you are doing immediately, put a cold wash rag on your forehead, take 4 Advil and a double scotch and email me first thing in the morning. Your better off burying your money in the backyard with the dog bones.


    Long term, oil might have some appeal to investors again, but not through shale oil. Those shale guys need $80-90 oil to pay all that debt back now. If I am wrong why haven't they already paid it down? Think they "like" owing more than they are worth and having a credit rating of BBB? Or paying $450MM bucks a year in interest is cool?



    10 comments
    turkmenia
    Feb 10

    Sit tight for 4 more years, Mike - Total figured it’ll take that long to go into 10mm deficit

    https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news/2185346-total-warns-of-10mn-bd-oil-supply-shortfall-by-2025


    0
    Mike Shellman
    Feb 10

    Wow! If that's right by half, which it probably will be, at least, as they say in Aberdeen; we're fooked. This great, thank you; its going on the news page !


    Thank you for checking in and I hope you will come back, Turk. I gotta a helluva gas well fire to show someday in Turkmenistan, by the way,

    0
    turkmenia
    Feb 21

    @Mike Shellman got this email when I worked in Turkmenistan. Missed you on Twitter and LI - your choice? I’m pretty sure you’ve seen video of a gas well fire was out off by a nuke blast during Soviet times. Stay positive and healthy, mate.

    turkmenia
    Feb 21

    @Mike Shellman got this email when I worked in Turkmenistan. Missed you on Twitter and LI - your choice? I’m pretty sure you’ve seen video of a gas well fire was out off by a nuke blast during Soviet times. Stay positive and healthy, mate.

    Mike Shellman
    Feb 21

    @turkmenia I have seen that film, yes; its great. Yes, I left both Twitter and LinkedIn voluntarily, though I have rejoined LinkedIn under Oily Stuff just recently, just to observe.

    Thank you, please check back!!


    0
    Montgomery Burns
    Feb 10

    www.reuters.com
    Equinor sells U.S. Bakken shale assets, posts record loss for 2020
    Norway's Equinor has agreed to sell its assets in the U.S. Bakken shale oil province after a decade of multibillion-dollar losses and criticism for poor investment decisions.

    Equinor seems tired of drilling from that FCF.

    Montgomery Burns
    Feb 10

    Its a bit ironic, equinor owns 40+% of the Johan Sverdrup field generating massive CF only to piss it away on the tight oil adventure, meanwhile partners with smaller shares are making a killing and are in much better shape then the super major.


    Seems to be the case with most supermajors these days or even worse, forced to sell off their good assets to buy some more time operating what got you into this mess.


    The rational thing would ofc be what equinor now is forced to to in public, but that requires admitting a mistake and waste of gigantic proportions so the show must go on i guess for some.


    It probably isnt to far fetched to assume this have something to do with the Norwegian government summoning the US bosses for a little chat in Norway a while ago regarding the US adventure.

    0
    Mike Shellman
    Feb 10  ·  Edited: Feb 11

    Chesapeake exits bankruptcy as CEO Lawler sees ‘new era’ for shale (worldoil.com)


    Chesapeake walked $7.7 billion dollars of debt and re-emerged bankruptcy recently. Its laying off folks so fast they can't all get out the door together. What does CHK do after bankruptcy? It immediately borrows another $1.3 billion dollars and its corporate elevator operator says this: “We’re going to offer a very competitive, free-cash flow generation machine that has a disciplined approach to our capital-reinvestment rate, that has a very strong, disciplined approach to our cash cost – focused not just on profitability but also sustainability,” Lawler CHK's CEO) said.


    Chesapeake has been in the shale oil and shale gas biz for 18 years; its never made a nickel. Now, its going to rock. How?


    You know who made lots of money at CHK?


    Lawler did. Over $100MM in just the last 5 years. The curve with the big sag in it is CHK earnings compared to his compensation.


    The idea that this fella comes out of bankruptcy, with that big shit eating grin on his face, saying he is going to offer a "free cash flow generation machine" makes me want to take the American Needs America's Oil bumper sticker off my truck in shame and embarrassment.



    Rune Likvern
    Feb 11  ·  Edited: Feb 11

    New shale oil wells deliver profitability (with profitability is here meant returning a yield above at least 7% before inflation adjustments [currently around 2%]) with an oil price of $70 - $80/Bo (using current well productivities as derived from actual data) during the well’s lifetime.

    Shale’s big problem now has been and will continue to be a long period with too low oil prices, which continually increases the financial burdens from employed capital (both owners’ capital and debt, capital that needs to be recovered before a profit can be made) on the rapid declining remaining Proven Developed Producing (PDP) reserves.

    At current oil prices (around $60/Bo [Brent]), this will only worsen with time.

    Put another way, as time passes, and at the current oil price, each remaining oil barrel [in the ground] of the rapidly declining remaining PDP reserves will see rapid growth in its financial burden to reach breakeven.

    It was estimated that the estimated remaining PDP reserves for the Permian as of Sep-20 needed about $80 - $85/Bo to reach a non-inflation adjusted breakeven (looking at the Permian as one big project).

    To make a non-inflation adjusted return of 7% (which these days are decent), each remaining barrel in the ground as per Sep-20 would have to catch an estimated $120/Bo as they left the wellhead.

    Applying statistics would present such a lasting oil price, an infrequent event.

    To illustrate this simplistic, say someone invested $1M in a company drilling shale oil wells in 2018, and they nominally got their $1M back in 2028 after 10 years.

    The purchasing power of the $1M in 2018, and assuming an average CPI/inflation of 2,5% in the period, would by 2028 reduce the purchasing power from the $1M originally put to work in 2018 to $0.78M.

    Keep in mind that this $1M invested will be returned to the investor after having been recirculated by the operating company into new wells and after debts are paid back.

    Burying the same $1M in the backyard with the dog bones in 2018 would be a better alternative as you could recover that $1M any time you needed it before 2028 (it would still depreciate due to inflation).

    Mike Shellman
    Feb 11

    Thank you, Rune. For those who don't know Rune Likvern please google his name and, with regard to shale economics and finance, best listen up. He knows his stuff.


    For me there are a number of very important takeaways from this comment; the definition of when "profit" actually begins, for instance, and the the time value of capex that often takes 4-5 years to recover, or more, on a per unit (well) basis.

    Also, when I think of the burden that declining PDP has on the ability to service and pay down legacy debt I often forget that remaining PDP must also carry a much greater portion of production costs, for instance the cost of building and managing infrastructure to handle oceans of water in the Permian. Liability insurance, G&A, etc. Lost too in all the hubbub about rig efficiencies and economies of scale is the simple fact that most services to the shale oil sector are now provided at a loss. That simply cannot continue to happen or there will not be a sector left to service shale oil. As prices inch higher costs WILL increase, I believe. Significantly.


    Otherwise I do not wish to distract from this terrific comment, only to remind people once again to not buy into the hype. Prices have to go WAY up to save most of the shale oil sector now, as Rune outlines for us.


    Thank you, Rune. I am honored you commented. Please come back anytime.